Reflections on the African Mining Indaba and the 16th edition of the Alternative Mining Indaba (AMI) reveal the need for a reform of the mining industry from its extractivism model of resource depletion. The African Mining Indaba and Alternative Mining Indaba highlighted the disconnect between the mining industry’s focus on profit and the demands of communities for respect, human rights, and environmental protection, sparking critical conversations of the mining sector.
By Staff Reporter
As the dust settles on the recent African Mining Indaba and Alternative Mining Indaba, it’s clear that the mining sector in Africa is at a crossroads. The two events, held concurrently in Cape Town, South Africa brought together disparate groups with differing approaches to addressing the complex issues surrounding mining in Africa.
The African Mining Indaba, attended by industry leaders, investors, and government representatives, focused on promoting investment, driving economic growth, and showcasing Africa’s mineral wealth. In contrast, the Alternative Mining Indaba (AMI) provided a platform for community voices, civil society organizations, and activists to share their concerns, experiences, and demands.
The disconnect between the business-focused African Mining Indaba and the community-centered Alternative Mining Indaba was stark. While companies prioritize profit and efficiency, communities demand respect for their rights, livelihoods, and environments.
As the mining sector continues to grapple with the concept of sustainable mining, it’s clear that there is still much work to be done. Can mining be sustainable, ecologically balancing the conflicting interests of profiteering and human development?
The question of how to reconcile the economic benefits of mining with the need to protect human rights, environments, and community interests is a critical preoccupation of this generation.
Civil society movements demand a transformative mining value chain that recognizes the finite nature of minerals, destructive models of extractivism, and the collusion of corporations with states at the expense of people and the environment (planet).
These questions linger, and civic society must continue to engage in these critical conversations says Tracy Mutowekuziva, Centre for Natural Resource Governance (CNRG) programs manager.
“As we move forward, it’s essential that we redefine sustainable mining and ensure that the benefits of mineral extraction are shared equitably among all stakeholders.
“As I drew comparisons between the two events, I was reminded that we still have a long way to go in defining what sustainable mining truly means, if at all it does it exist.
“The disconnect between business and human rights approaches to mining is evident. While companies prioritize profit and efficiency, communities demand respect for their rights, livelihoods, and environments,” states Mutowekuziva
In addressing the foregoing challenge to reconcile the economic benefits of mining with the need to protect human rights, environments, and community interests, civil society faces resistance from mining corporations and corrupt states.
The solution is however simple, according to Mutowekuziva and the future of mining in Africa depends on it. “By working together, we can create a more inclusive and sustainable mining sector that prioritizes the needs of both business and community.”
Mutowekuziva moderated an impactful panel discussion at the Alternative Mining Indaba, which focused on critical issues surrounding mining, inequality, and environmental justice.
During the panel, titled “Unearthing the Truth: Addressing Inequality and Environmental Justice,” key topics were explored all focusing on how communities are left to bear the brunt of externalised costs of mining.
At one of the sessions, a documentary titled Critical to Who? produced by CNRG, which exposed how lithium extraction in Bikita district of Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe, is precipitating a socio-ecological disaster for communities in resource-rich areas, opened our eyes to the complexities of critical minerals and their extraction.
The screening of the documentary unearthing the externalized costs of lithium extraction, offered a pivot point for CNRG and its partners to advocate for meaningful reforms within the extractive sector.

